Update

Dear Supporters,

Thank you again for your encouragement!

As you know, the unofficial election results reported last night indicated that I came in third in Ward 3, only 2 votes behind candidate June Hofland.

The official results have now been posted on the City website by the City Clerk – please see below.

The City Clerk (Stephen O’Brien) has advised me that an automatic recount only occurs when there is an actual tie, and that a recount can only be requested through two avenues – a Motion of Council or by order of the Superior Court of Justice.

Mr. O’Brien has advised me that he plans to request a recount of the Ward 3 results at the next City Council meeting on November 17th. For the media release click here.

Thank you for your vote and for your continued support!

Craig

Ward 3 Candidates (2 to be elected)
Candidate Votes
 Phil Allt  2299
 June Hofland  2050
 Craig Chamberlain  2045
 Maggie Laidlaw  1861
 Bob Moore  1131
 Jason Dodge  878

 

Posted in Accountability, For Voters | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Positive choices now and into the future

cham-2 6Ward 3, as you may know I’ve been doing a lot of door knocking, and have had a lot of conversations with you at your door, on the street and over coffee!

If you have a question or concern you want to talk about, email me at craigchamberlain@rogers.com and we’ll set up a time for us to meet.

My job, if you elect me as your councillor, is to engage you on what matters to you, and watch how your money is spent. With better engagement we will have better questions at council because as I know, you have the best questions about your city!

And with better questions we can make better decisions at City Hall.

As I have said, better engagement is not just a platform, it’s who I am. It’s how I see politics — it’s not about me, it’s about you. It’s a type of service I would be privileged to be entrusted with, for you and with you.

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????I know from our conversations affordability is a concern.

Actually, it’s an on-going point of stress for many of you, it can affect relationships and THAT just doesn’t seem to register with the incumbents. The mentality has been, “how can we get taxes higher”.

Many of you are feeling enough is enough. I’m here to say, that’s valid. You are not a bad person for saying you want more respect for the tax dollars you send to City Hall, and you want more transparency in how they are spent. And you want the people who work for you to work on keeping costs down.

The fact of the matter is you deserve more compassion in what City Hall asks from you. Hit with year-after-year tax increases at rates above increases in your income, something has to give!

I want us to be in a position to make positive choices. Because, as I have maintained all along, affordability and priority-setting and sustainability are linked. What we’re doing has to be affordable to you, now and into the future. Otherwise, it can’t be sustained without going in directions we wouldn’t otherwise choose for ourselves.

I want us to be able to choose who we become, as a community, with our growth pressures – which includes addressing our older infrastructure needs.

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????We have to refocus if we are to be able to make those choices, and that means we must stop wasting money and time and energy in chasing impossible legal battles that we end up losing — which also hurts our reputation — and instead invest our money and time and energy on running, building and rebuilding this city.

If we are to be in position to make positive choices about how we grow and what development we want to have, we need to change the culture at City Hall which is draining our money and time and energy.

That means a change on council.

We need to ask what rises in resource, energy and borrowing costs will mean for our ability to maintain our infrastructure, whether it be the buried infrastructure in the form of water, storm water and waste water pipes, or our roads, our buildings, our city fleets.

We need to get it right, now — we need to come together as a community on this.

Otherwise, we’re just passing on a future of failing infrastructure to our children and grandchildren. What kind of future is that? How will they meet the costs? What will that mean for sustainability and affordability for them?

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Please vote for me, please vote for a refocusing of your municipal dollars.

Please vote for action towards genuine sustainability and positive choices.

Ward 3, please vote for Craig Chamberlain.

Thank you! Craig

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy, Wellbeing? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Time for change. Please vote for it.

Claire with our signsThank you for opening your door to me and thank you for the encouragement!

Through my door knocking we’ve been able to meet, and what I’ve heard is it is time for change on council.

As you likely know, I’m the candidate with the red, blue, green and orange signs. That is my statement that I am about representing YOU at City Hall.

It’s time for more balance on council. Please vote for it in Ward 3.

Please vote for Craig Chamberlain.

cham-2 6As many of you know about me, I’m easy to talk to when you have something you want to talk about.

Email me at craigchamberlain@rogers.com and I’ll drop by, or we can meet for coffee.

I’m a good guy. I hold myself to high standard of accountability and integrity, and those who know me know that to be true!

Enjoy the fall colours everyone!

Craig

Posted in Accountability, For Voters | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

In a Ward 3 councillor’s own words

Maggie Laidlaw, a “veteran councillor” of this past administration currently seeking re-election in Ward 3, posted this:

Ward 3, it’s become clear from all of my conversations with you, that yes, you have been left to “stand outside” city council by the very people who were elected to represent YOU.

Do you want another four years of it?

cham-2 6I know you are concerned about how your money is being spent at City Hall and ever rising City taxes, especially at rates above increases in your income. You are concerned for good reasons, which are your own.

So, OK, we get it, Maggie: you really don’t think much about the “taxpayers” you were elected to represent  — and are hoping to represent for another four years.

Maggie, I guess that’s your right, though it does leave me wondering what kind of assumptions you make about us as people. Who exactly do you think we are? Do you even know the ward you’ve been representing?

Ward 3, I know you are looking for change. Enough is enough. Please vote Craig Chamberlain.

It’s time for balance on council, it’s time for a more respectful attitude towards you and how your money is spent at City Hall.

Ward 3, it’s time to come back inside council chambers.

Craig

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Advance voting locations open today!

cham-2 6Thank you for your interest in this election! Ward 3, let’s have the highest voter turn-out in the city!

Internet voting is underway (click here to cast your ballot online), and advance voting locations will be open for you from October 15th to October 19th — for more information, click here.

All advance voting locations are available for you, regardless of where you live.

I know from my door knocking and from countless conversations that Ward 3 is looking for change.

Please vote for me, Craig Chamberlain, for more balance and better engagement in how you are represented at City Hall, for accountability and real transparency, and priorities that matter to you.

Thank you!

Craig

Posted in Accountability | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Online voting now open!

Interested in voting online in Guelph’s municipal elections? Click here.

Ward 3, please vote for Craig Chamberlain!

Posted in Accountability, For Voters | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

By the numbers: a Ward 3 infrastructure snapshot

cham-2 6I’ve knocked on doors across the ward and have had a lot of good conversations with you about the representation you’ve had at City Hall and the priorities that matter to you.

You want your roads and sidewalks fixed. And you want them cleared properly in the winter. That’s especially an issue for those who have narrow streets in Ward 3.

For many of you, the patch on patch road repairs and the orange paint on the sidewalks just doesn’t — and won’t — cut it anymore. You deserve better value for the taxes you pay.

And as I’ve been saying for some time now, it’s time that Ward 3 is heard — it’s your money in taxes and it’s your money in wear and tear on your vehicle (and on the City’s fleet, which you also maintain with your taxes).

I photographed and tweeted bad areas this spring and summer, and I’m glad there has been action on some of those roads. Clearly, the problems didn’t develop overnight:

When we don’t keep pace with repair and replacement work for our infrastructure such as our roads, our sidewalks, or the buried infrastructure we rely on, when we defer that work, it becomes more extensive. It becomes more costly and it can be more disruptive to fix.

Deferring this work pushes the costs forward. It’s not conducive to sustainability or affordability. What will that mean for Guelph citizens and taxpayers?

It’s time for council to refocus on municipal priorities. If you care about Guelph being truly sustainable and affordable now and into the future, please vote for me.

Consider the following stats I’ve obtained for you from City Hall, and remember that we’re not a ward of brand new roads, sidewalks and other infrastructure. Yes, there has been some repair work, but many of you know first hand just how bad it’s been.

  • Ward 3 Sidewalks
    • Total kilometers in Ward 3: 109 km
    • Percentage of Guelph’s sidewalks located in Ward 3: 16%
  • Ward 3 Roadways
    • Total kilometers in Ward 3: 82.28 km
    • Percentage of Guelph’s roadways located in Ward 3: 15.4%
  • Ward 3 Water Infrastructure
    • Total kilometers of watermain in Ward 3: 79.7 km
    • Percentage of Guelph’s watermain in Ward 3: 14.3%
    • Total kilometers of Guelph’s Sanitary sewer in Ward 3: 67.9 km
    • Percentage of Guelph’s Sanitary sewer in Ward 3: 13.1%
    • Total kilometers of Guelph’s Stormwater system in Ward 3: 66.7 km
    • Percentage of Guelph’s Stormwater infrastructure in Ward 3: 13.8%

Please don’t let anyone suggest to you that this isn’t an issue, that all is fine.

And did you know our Stormwater infrastructure scored an F? See this City of Guelph  infrastructure scorecard (click here).

For more information on our infrastructure (yes, OUR infrastructure), click here.

Thank you everyone for all of your encouragement. Please vote for me and please talk to others on my behalf as well!

Craig

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Yes, it’s time for affordable taxes

cham-2 cropped 2Ward 3, through my door knocking across the ward it’s clear that you are concerned about how your money is being spent at City Hall. You work hard in support of our city in any number of ways, through your paid and unpaid commitments to this community.

You expect and deserve accountability for how your tax dollars are spent at City Hall. And yes, you deserve priorities that make sense to you. It’s your money!

You’re told a lot about how great things are now but your roads need to be fixed. You want the buses rolling, the roads cleared in the winter, and you’re tired of the orange paint on your sidewalks.

For many of you, concern about the affordability of city services is a real. And it’s time that you’re heard. You are my experts.

Ward 3, many of you don’t see year after year increases in your income, and if you do, it’s often not above the Consumer Price Index. That’s reality.

So, it’s time for City Hall to recognize that tax increases can’t happen outside of what the payer, that’s YOU, can afford. It’s time to send that message. Please vote for me.

And what’s affordable also relates to what is sustainable. If the payer into the system is taxed year after year at rates higher than increases to their household income, where does lead?

What does that mean for you?

It can cause a lot of stress.

Ward 3, yes, it’s time for affordable taxes. Please vote for a more respectful attitude about your money, please vote Craig Chamberlain.

You can vote online, at the advance polls or on Election Day, October 27, 2014.

And thank you for all of the encouragement!

Craig

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy, Wellbeing? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

City of Guelph Contract No. 06-043

cham-2 6Transparency includes posting information online — but it has to go beyond that.

To me, transparency is about providing full information, and providing it in a format that is easy to access and read. That means doing something more than posting bits of information on the City website and leaving it for you to pull it all together, if you can find it.

And without REAL transparency — that is, presenting information completely, presenting it in a way that is easy to find and understand, there is no REAL accountability. It’s not hard to do better, and you’re paying for it with your taxes.

So, when City Hall falls short, it does raise questions and that’s valid. And when it engages in spin, when it goes into spin-overdrive, it’s a disservice to the whole organization, along with the disservice it represents to each of us as citizens.

Low transparency and spin doesn’t do anything to promote an example of respect with those that City Hall engages, be it City staff, citizens, would-be collaborators, those we do business with, those who want to invest here — which is at the core of the problems at City Hall.

There needs to be an example of respect and council has a unique role to play in this regard. It sets the example for the entire organization.

Respect was very much lacking when City Hall told us not to worry about how the Urbacon costs would be covered, that they’ll just come out of the City’s reserves. Only, those reserves are our reserves. We all did what we needed to do to pay into those reserves through our taxes.

I knew change was needed at City Hall, but wow, that was revealing.

Which is to say, change must happen at City Hall and it must begin with council. Change requires a change on who is sitting around the horseshoe. Please vote for better government, please vote for Craig Chamberlain.

Guelph City Council put this project into motion by accepting the recommendation to proceed with City of Guelph Contract No. 06-043 at a Special Meeting of City Council on June 26th, 2006 (click here to access it).

And now, incredibly, some would have you think it’s all yesterday’s news, it’s a closed matter, and it’s time for you to just move on already. Which suggests THAT certainly is not the case for you!

The fact of the matter is we now have about a multi-million dollar hole in the coffers we all paid into — we still have THAT. And actually, it’s not over yet, as we are waiting on the Aviva settlement.

And let’s not kid ourselves, Urbacon happened within a culture at City Hall. It didn’t happen in isolation of it.

So, yes, without a change towards more accountability and respect, without a better example of accountability and transparency by council, we’ll see more misadventures with the public’s tax dollars.

You can bank your tax dollars on it.

The following is an example of this citizen simply wanting more transparency regarding the costs associated with the Urbacon fiasco. It’s incomplete, and it will be inaccurate, which is part of my point (but never my intention). Citizens don’t have a simple, straight-forward list of expenses from City Hall, which undermines the public trust.

City Hall has the means and the responsibility to present information in a clear manner and not leave it to citizens to have to fish around for it. They deserve nothing less for their taxes and the Ward 3 incumbents should have demanded it.

Urbacon-related Costs (Original Project Total: $50,749,700)
Demolition of Memorial Gardens: $2,063,700
Contract for City Hall: $32,498,000 (Includes underground parking component)
Contract for Courthouse: $9,502,000
Architect’s fees for City Hall: $1,963,000
Architect’s fees for Courthouse: $703,000
Other: City Hall: $1,636,000 (Fees, permits, fixtures)
Other: Courthouse: $284,000 (Fees, permits, fixtures)
Contingency: City Hall: $1,624,900
Contingency: Courthouse: $475,100
Financing/ Borrowing Costs ?
City staff time/ City resources on project ?
City staff time dealing with Lien claims ?
City Legal: Trial preparations ?
City staff time/ City resources: trial prep ?
City Legal: Trial ?
City staff time: Trial ?
Expert witnesses at trial ? (Included in outside legal expenses)
City Legal post-trial ?
City staff post-trial ?
City Legal, trying to change 2nd trial date ?
City Legal, reviewing settlement ?
City staff time, reviewing settlement ?
Additional leasing costs due to delays $481,119
Outside Legal costs: $2,233,982 (This is what we are told in terms of our legal costs)
Settlement costs: $5,855,264 (We settled for $6.635M with Urbacon, but let’s just use this number)
Aviva Settlement Costs ? TBD
Additional completion costs $8,346,261 ??? Additions, change orders, change of contractor…
Total: $67,666,326

 

Background email correspondence with City staff

Dear Mr. Chamberlain,

Thank you for your e-mail. I am happy to clarify project costs for the City Hall and POA Courthouse project.

You are correct that the contract cost for the project totalled $42 million.

This is different from the project construction cost, which includes design, architect, and engineering fees as well as other costs. The approved budget for the project was $54.8 million ($42 million for City Hall and $12.8 million for the courthouse). Federal and provincial grants and other funding increased the total funding available to $56,711,399. The total project expenses prior to the litigation and settlement were $56,968,414, which means that prior to the litigation the project had a deficit of $257,015.

The additional leasing costs incurred during the delays totaled $481,119. On the other hand, the delay in moving into the building would have resulted in some operating savings (for example, utilities and cleaning costs), so the net additional operating cost to the City would be lower.

You are correct that legal costs do not include City staff time; they include the City’s total outside legal fees, expert reports, expert witnesses and other witness fees.

The settlement cost is $6.635 million as reported. But the actual net cost to the City is $5,855,264; this is because funds remain of a holdback the City already paid into court to satisfy subtrade lien claims. The subtrade claims will be satisfied from the settlement funds and so the City will receive the balance in the court account.  The City will also receive input tax credits.

It is this $5,855,264 that, when added to the $2,233,982 in legal costs and the original $257,015 deficit, brings us to the total overage of $8,346,261 that was publicly reported.

Thank you for writing to clarify this information. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

***

Good Afternoon Craig,

Further information for you regarding costs arising from the City Hall move.

1.      With regard to our relationship with landlords: Was the City sued by the landlords as part of the move? No, we were not sued by the landlords. There is one outstanding matter related to leasehold improvements but it is not related to the Urbacon litigation.

2.      With regard to the County: When the decision was made to terminate the builder, was the County informed of this action ahead of it, was there consultation on this move? When and how did it become aware of it? From memory the County had @$5.5M in it for the courthouse. We are not aware of the nature of communications between the County and City during this period as they related to Urbacon; the Provincial Courthouse project was the next phase of the project and was not scheduled to commence until after the building was commissioned, employees were relocated.

3.      With regard to extra moving costs.

The lump sum of $481,119 include invoices for moving.  A  review of the files renders two entries totalling $ 9900 (move from 42 Wyndham and 98 MacDonell) plus extra staff time of $1600. I have rounded these sums up.

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Broken. Public. Trust.

 

The bottom line for Ward 3 Guelph citizens:

Urbacon fiasco = broken public trust.

 

Posted in Accountability, For Voters, Our money, their legacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off